Malnutrition in Emergency General Surgery Patients: Does Its Impact Differ by Procedural Risk Level?
Authors:
Barbara Okafor, Joaquim Havens, Manuel Castillo-Angeles, Rebecca Wiener, Reza Askari, Stephanie Nitzschke
Body of Abstract:
Background: Malnutrition is a critical factor influencing patient outcomes following emergency general surgery (EGS). It is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Understanding the extent and impact of malnutrition can inform strategies to improve surgical outcomes and patient recovery. Therefore, our goal was to determine if the increased burden of morbidity and mortality of malnutrition in EGS patients varies based on the level of procedural risk.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2015-2018) was queried to identify adult patients that underwent one of 7 previously described EGS procedures. These were stratified as high-risk (excision of large intestine, excision of small intestine, surgical treatment of ulcer of stomach or duodenum, lysis of peritoneal adhesions and laparotomy) and low-risk (appendectomy and cholecystectomy). Malnutrition was defined using ICD-10 Diagnosis codes. Our main outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between malnutrition and mortality, and subsequently, this was stratified by procedural risk level.
Results: A weighted total of 3,493,853 EGS admissions were identified. Mean age was 53.64 (SD 20.71), 43.76% were male and 66.51% were white. Overall mortality was 2.33%. Malnutrition was found in 278,175 (7.96%) EGS patients and mortality within this group was 8.27%. High-risk procedures represented 55.32% of the total EGS population. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, malnutrition was an independent predictor of mortality (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.07, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.94 – 3.20). After stratified analysis, this association remained significant for high-risk procedures (OR 2.34, 95% CI 2.24 – 2.44) and it was stronger within low-risk procedures (OR 5.82, 95% CI 4.96 – 6.83).
Conclusion: Malnutrition was significantly associated with mortality in patients undergoing EGS, with an even greater association in low-risk procedures. These findings support that preoperative assessment, and screening should be applied universally because even low-risk procedures may represent a high risk among patients who are malnourished.
