Surgical Hand Antisepsis and Surgical Site Infections

/in ,

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) remain a significant problem to both the patients and the healthcare system. Value care and standardized quality measures continue to promote improvement in surgical asepsis, but certain debates remain unresolved in the field of surgical hand antisepsis.

Methods: Review of relevant accounts and literature.

Results: Controversy has existed regarding the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s 1994 Tentative Final Monograph (TFM), which defined how surgical hand antisepsis products are assessed. Issues involving neutralizers and demonstration of a cumulative effect were addressed in the FDA’s Proposed Rule in 2015. Few studies have used SSI as a primary outcome and instead have used a surrogate marker (colony-forming units [CFU]). Quantitative microbiology studies suggest a minimum bacterial inoculum of 105–107 CFU/mL is necessary to cause a clinical infection. Outcomes of antisepsis likely are driven by both active ingredient(s) and overall product formulation. Povidone–iodine aqueous scrubs are inferior to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) 4% aqueous scrubs and alcohol-based rubs (ABR). The SSI and CFU outcomes studies support the equivalence or superiority of ABR over CHG.

Conclusions: Both ABRs and CHG 4% are preferred to povidone–iodine for surgical hand antisepsis. Well-powered randomized controlled trials measuring SSI as a primary outcome, as well as those designed according to either TFM or European methodology, with appropriate controls and neutralizers, are warranted. These trials should incorporate different ABR formulations and CHG 4%, as well as skin tolerance assessments and a cost analysis.

Read More

Coccidioidomycosis: Surgical Issues and Implications

/in ,

Abstract

Background: Coccidioidomycosis, commonly called “valley fever,” “San Joaquin fever,” “desert fever,” or “desert rheumatism,” is a multi-system illness caused by infection with Coccidioides fungi (C. immitis or C. posadasii). This organism is endemic to the desert Southwest regions of the United States and Mexico and to parts of South America. The manifestations of infection occur along a spectrum from asymptomatic to mild self-limited fever to severe disseminated disease.

Methods: Review of the English-language literature.

Results: There are five broad indications for surgical intervention in patients with coccidioidomycosis: Tissue diagnosis in patients at risk for co-existing pathology, perforation, bleeding, impingement on critical organs, and failure to resolve with medical management. As part of a multidisciplinary team, surgeons may be responsible for the care of infected patients, particularly those with severe disease.

Conclusion: This review discusses the history, microbiology, epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of coccidioidomycosis, focusing on situations that may be encountered by surgeons.

Read More

Intra-Operative Surgical Irrigation of the Surgical Incision: What Does the Future Hold—Saline, Antibiotic Agents, or Antiseptic Agents?

/in ,

Abstract

Background: Intra-operative surgical site irrigation (lavage) is common practice in surgical procedures in general, with all disciplines advocating some form of irrigation before incision closure. This practice, however, has been neither standardized nor is there compelling evidence that it effectively reduces the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This narrative review addresses the laboratory and clinical evidence that is available to support the practice of irrigation of the abdominal cavity and superficial/deep incisional tissues, using specific irrigation solutions at the end of an operative procedure to reduce the microbial burden at wound closure.

Methods: Review of PubMed and OVID for pertinent, scientific, and clinical publications in the English language was performed.

Results: Incision irrigation was found to afford a three-fold benefit: First, to hydrate the bed; second, to assist in allowing better examination of the area immediately before closure; and finally, by removing superficial and deep incisional contamination and lowering the bioburden, expedite the healing process. The clinical practice of intra-operative peritoneal lavage is highly variable and is dependent solely on surgeon preference. By contrast, intra-operative irrigation after device-related procedures has become a standard of care for the prophylaxis of acute peri-prosthetic infection. The clinical evidence that supports the use of antibiotic irrigation is limited and based on retrospective analysis and few acceptable randomized controlled trials. The results of laboratory and animal studies using aqueous 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate are favorable, suggesting that further studies are justified to determine its clinical efficacy.

Conclusion: The adoption of appropriate and standardized intra-operative irrigation practices into peri-operative care bundles, which include other evidence-based strategies (weight-based antimicrobial prophylaxis, antimicrobial sutures, maintenance of normothermia, and glycemic control), offers an inexpensive and effective method to reduce the risk of post-operative SSI and deserves further evaluation.

Read More

Surgical Infection Society Curriculum Development Symposium: An Overview

/in ,

Abstract

Hospital-acquired infections, sepsis, and critically ill patients cost the healthcare system billions of dollars every year. Many factors contribute to these problems, and the remedies are multifactorial. Education is an important component in resolving many of the issues related to better combating the economic, social, and personal costs associated with surgical infections. The Surgical Infection Society (SIS) convened a symposium to begin a dialogue on how the SIS can facilitate a better understanding of how to educate the surgical infection professionals and trainees. The following report summarizes the presentations and commentary presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Read More

Proportion of Surgical Site Infections Occurring after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review

/in ,

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common type of healthcare-associated infection, contributing to substantial annual morbidity, costs, and deaths. In the United States it is the number one reason for hospital re-admission after surgery. Relatively little attention has been paid to the proportion of SSIs that occur after discharge. This paper systematically reviews two decades of publications to characterize better the proportion of SSIs that are identified after discharge and the need for better early detection and treatment.

Methods: A restricted systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify English-language studies published after 1995 that include the occurrence of pre-discharge and post-discharge SSIs. The data abstracted were the date of publication, country of origin, procedure, study design, surveillance system, population size, follow-up rate, and SSI counts and proportions. Descriptive statistics and forest plots were used to characterize the data set, represent the overall proportion of SSIs occurring after discharge, and assess the heterogeneity of the studies.

Results: A total of 55 articles met the inclusion criteria, with data from 1,432,293 operations and 141,347 SSIs based on studies from 15 countries. The overall proportion of operations leading to SSI was 9.9%. Of the 141,347 infections, 84,984 (60.1%) appeared after discharge. The proportion of SSIs after discharge differed among studies, from 13.5 to 94.8, and was heterogeneous for all studies and for most individual surgery types.

Conclusion: Post-discharge SSIs constitute the majority of these infections and pose a substantial disease burden for surgical patients globally and for different surgery types. Further examination is warranted to determine the methodologic and clinical factors moderating the proportion of post-discharge SSIs.

Read More

Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Review

/in ,

Abstract

Background: Soft tissue infections are a common reason for general surgical consultation. Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) are a rapidly progressive form of this infection that account for significant morbidity and many deaths.

Methods: Review of relevant English-language publications.

Results: There are approximately 500–1,500 cases of NSTI annually in the United States, although accurate estimates of their frequency are difficult to obtain. These infections may be polymicrobial or monomicrobial, and substantial regional heterogeneity exists regarding anatomic location and the involved organisms. Source control with early surgical debridement and targeted anti-microbial therapy are the mainstays of treatment.

Conclusion: Necrotizing soft tissue infections remain a common indication for general surgical consultation. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment are essential for effective control.

Read More

Topical Antimicrobials and the Open Surgical Wound

/in ,

Abstract

Background: Topical antiseptic and antibiotic agents have been used for the prevention of surgical site infections since Joseph Lister’s original research on this subject. Although these agents are used extensively in clinical practice, evidence to support the use of topical antimicrobial agents remains limited.

Patients and Methods: The world literature on the use of antiseptic and antibiotic agents was evaluated to determine the current status of evidence to support the use of topical antimicrobial agents in the prevention of surgical site infections.

Results: Although several techniques of using topical antibiotic solutions, powders, antibiotic gauzes, and beads have some evidence for validation, there are equal numbers of reports that have failed to show benefit. There is little evidence to support the use of antiseptic solutions in the prevention of infections at the surgical site.

Conclusions: Additional clinical trials are necessary to provide evidence to support any of the methods for using topical antimicrobial agents to present surgical site infections. Dilute antiseptic agents should be considered in future trials when antimicrobial activity can be identified without local toxicity.

Read More

CAUTIs and CLABSIs: Do Physicians REALLY Know What They Are?

/in ,

Abstract

Background: The incidences of hospital-acquired conditions, such as catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) and central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) are being used to compare quality at institutions and determine reimbursements. These data come from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) administrative database that relies almost exclusively on physician documentation as opposed to objective U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. We hypothesize that the UHC-identified rates of CAUTIs and CLABSIs are inaccurate compared with the CDC definitions for these infections.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study from January 2012 through September 2013 comparing the incidences of CLABSIs and CAUTIs, as identified through our UHC database to those identified by the Department of Epidemiology using strict CDC guidelines. We performed subset analysis on those infections identified by UHC but not CDC to determine the causes for these discrepancies.

Results: There were a total of 221 CAUTIs and 238 CLABSIs identified during this time frame. Of these, 16 CAUTIs (7.2%) and 44 (18.5%) CLABSIs were detected by both UHC and CDC. 72.4% (42/58) of the CAUTIs and 52.7% (49/93) of the CLABSIs identified by UHC were not identified by CDC. 91% (163/179) of the CAUTIs and 77% (145/189) of the CLABSIs identified by CDC were not identified by UHC. The cause of these differences in identification included lack of culture data, lack of positive cultures, and catheters present on admission.

Conclusions: There is a major disconnect between identification of infections depending on what process is used. This can lead to inappropriate treatment and inaccurate institutional comparisons that impact reimbursements. Because UHC identification of infections are primarily based on physician documentation, educating providers should result in more accurate recognition of infections thereby ensuring appropriate use of therapy.

Read More

Antimicrobial Bowel Preparation for Elective Colon Surgery

/in ,

Abstract

Background: Mechanical bowel preparation continues to be a controversial subject for the pre-operative management of patients undergoing elective colon resection.

Methods: The English literature on bowel preparation was searched to identify pertinent publications.

Results: The published literature over the past 80 y confirms that mechanical bowel preparation alone does not reduce surgical site infections. However, the use of appropriate oral antibiotics following mechanical bowel preparation with pre-operative systemic antibiotics reduces rates of surgical site infections and anastomotic leaks when compared with systemic antibiotics alone.

Conclusions: Mechanical bowel preparation with pre-operative oral antibiotics and pre-operative systemic antibiotics are the standard of care for elective colon surgery. Refinement in methods of bowel preparation needs additional clinical investigations to further enhance outcomes.

Read More

Antimicrobial Formulation and Delivery in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

/in ,

Abstract

Background: A number of adjunct antimicrobial measures have been studied in an attempt to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rates. In addition to parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis, these measures include oral antibiotics in bowel preparation for colorectal surgery, antiseptic/antimicrobial irrigation, antimicrobial sutures, local antibiotics, skin incision antibacterial sealants, and antimicrobial dressings. It is the purpose of this review to study the evidence behind each of these measures and to evaluate relevant data for recommendations in each area.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature through PubMed was performed.

Results: Need for adequate dosing and re-dosing of intravenous peri-operative antibiotics, duration of antibiotic usage past wound closure, and the use of antibiotic bowel preparation in colorectal surgery are well defined in the published literature. However, data on local antimicrobial measures remain controversial.

Conclusions: Proper dosing and re-dosing of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics should become standard practice. Continuation of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis beyond wound closure is unnecessary in clean cases and remains controversial in clean-contaminated and complex cases. Oral antibiotic bowel preparation is an important adjunct to intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. The use of topical antimicrobial and antiseptic agents such as antibacterial irrigations, local antimicrobial application, antimicrobial-coated sutures, antibacterial wound sealants, and antimicrobial impregnated dressings in the prevention of SSI is questionable.

Read More